Legal Opinion

State v. Buck

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2007No. 04102314, A131973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Following a bench trial, the trial court convicted defendant of one count of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, a Measure 11 offense, see ORS 137.700(2)(a)(P). However, the court concluded that, under the circumstances, the 75-month sentence prescribed by Measure 11 would be so disproportionate to the offense that it would violate Article I, section 16, of the Oregon Constitution. Accordingly, the court imposed a sentence of 17 months. On appeal, the state assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to impose the Measure 11 sentence. Defendant cross-appeals, arguing that there was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Cannon v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Sustar v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. Camacho-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API