Legal Opinion

Maiorani v. Maiorani

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 18, 1954No. File 79665PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

The defendant William Maiorani pleaded in abatement on the ground, in effect, that service had been made upon him only by leaving a copy of the process in a mailbox in the vestibule of the apartment house in which he lived as distinguished from at or within his apartment. It was apparent that the plea sought to invoke the rule of Cugno v. Kaelin, 138 Conn. 341, 342.

The plea in abatement was filed April 6, 1954, and the plaintiff’s answer thereto was filed April 10, 1954. This answer included three special defenses. Thereafter, a motion to expunge certain paragraphs of the special defenses was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Cugno v. KaelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. H. Williamson, Ltd. v. PerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beach v. KorffConnecticut Superior Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API