Legal Opinion

Link v. Connell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1896No. 6524PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Ferguson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.

This was an action of ejectment by Connell, the defendant in error, against the plaintiff in error, Link, in the district court for Douglas county, the subject of the controversy being the northwest quarter of section 2, township 14, range 11, in said county. A trial was had in the court below, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff therein for the possession of the property in dispute and for $1,800 damage, the value of the rents and profits thereof, and which has by appropriate proceeding been removed into this court for review. Both parties claim through Emanuel H. Link, who…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. WarrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Lee v. City of McCookNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Crowell v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Neligh v. KeeneNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hollenbeck v. TarkingtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brasch v. BraschNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Flint v. ChaloupkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lammers Land & Cattle Co. v. HansNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Harvey v. GoddingNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Hyde v. HeatonWashington Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API