Legal Opinion
Vanater v. Village of South Point
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 29, 1989No. C-1-87-708PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HERMAN J. WEBER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to a two day trial to the Court at which both parties presented witnesses, experts and trial exhibits. Plaintiff’s Complaint seeks declaratory judgment and a permanent injunction against the defendants challenging the constitutionality of Ordinance Number 87-6 of the Village of South Point which prohibits the owning or harboring of Pit Bull Terriers or other vicious dogs within the limits of the village. On the basis of the evidence, testimony and arguments presented by both sides, the Court makes the following…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dias v. City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Gandee v. GlaserDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- United States v. Ernie C. Doyan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.