Legal Opinion

Tucker v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1998No. 96-CO-719PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

Fionne X. Tucker was convicted at a bench trial of several weapons offenses1 after officers of the United States Park Police recovered ammunition from Tucker’s person and a loaded pistol under the passenger seat of an automobile in which Tucker was riding. On appeal, Tucker contends that the trial judge should have granted his pretrial motion to suppress tangible evidence. He claims, inter alia, that the Motor Vehicle Tinted Window Amendment Act of 1994 (TWA), D.C.Code § 40-718.1 (Supp.1997), unconstitutionally discriminates on account of wealth. Because the pistol…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ciak v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. 1000 Feet DC Inc. v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage and Cannabis BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Conley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Frazier v. DC DOESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Vornado 3040 M Street LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API