Legal Opinion

Ciak v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 7, 2004No. S04A0343PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Justice.

This appeal places before the Court a challenge to the constitutionality of OCGA § 40-8-73.1, the statute governing the use of tinted automobile windows in Georgia, which provides in pertinent part that

it shall be unlawful for any resident person to operate a motor vehicle in this state . . . [w]hich has material and glazing applied... to ... the side or door windows, which... reduce light transmission through the . . . window to less than 32 percent or increase light reflectance to more than 20 percent.... The provisions of... this Code section shall not apply to ... [a]…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Williams v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Love v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. People v. PittsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. People v. EstrellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Christy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API