Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Weil-McLain

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 2006No. 4-05-0328PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH

Plaintiff, Sally Louise Nolan, as administratrix of the estate of her husband, Clarence Nolan (decedent), sued numerous manufacturers of asbestos-containing products, including defendant, Weil-McLain. Her complaint alleged the manufacturers were responsible for decedent’s injuries and later death. Before trial, all manufacturers but defendant settled or were dismissed. A jury returned a verdict against defendant, awarding plaintiff $2,368,000.

Defendant appeals, arguing that (1) the trial court erred by excluding evidence of decedent’s other exposures to asbestos; (2) the trial court erred by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Thacker v. U N R Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kochan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Lipke v. Celotex Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Pharr v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nolan v. Weil-McLainIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Daniels v. Arvinmeritor, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  3. Nolan v. Weil-McLainIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Nolan v. Weil-McLainAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API