Nolan v. Weil-McLain
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH
Plaintiff, Sally Louise Nolan, as administratrix of the estate of her husband, Clarence Nolan (decedent), sued numerous manufacturers of asbestos-containing products, including defendant, Weil-McLain. Her complaint alleged the manufacturers were responsible for decedent’s injuries and later death. Before trial, all manufacturers but defendant settled or were dismissed. A jury returned a verdict against defendant, awarding plaintiff $2,368,000.
Defendant appeals, arguing that (1) the trial court erred by excluding evidence of decedent’s other exposures to asbestos; (2) the trial court erred by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Thacker v. U N R Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Kochan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Lipke v. Celotex Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Pharr v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nolan v. Weil-McLainIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Daniels v. Arvinmeritor, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020
- Nolan v. Weil-McLainIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Nolan v. Weil-McLainAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006