Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Weil-McLain

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2009No. 103137PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Carman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Kilbride dissented, with opinion.

Justice Thomas took no part in the decision.

OPINION

Plaintiff, Sally Nolan, as executrix of the estate of her late husband, Clarence Nolan (decedent), sought recovery in the circuit court of Vermilion County against defendant, Weil-McLain, for the wrongful death of her husband. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff, and a majority of the appellate court affirmed. 365 Ill. App. 3d 963. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maple v. GustafsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Thacker v. U N R Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. McDonnell v. McPartlinIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Cetera v. DiFilippoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Gecker v. Estate of Flynn (In re Emerald Casino, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  4. Davis v. KraffAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Turcios v. The DeBruler CompanyIllinois Supreme Court · 2015

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API