Legal Opinion

Bernheim v. Christal

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1888No. 11097PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of thet Superior Court of Santa Cruz County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff as assignee of one O’Donnell to set aside a lien by judgment and execution claimed to have been obtained contrary to the provisions of the insolvent act of 1880.

In 1882 O’Donnell borrowed one thousand dollars from Christal, and gave a note therefor, payable in ninety days. On the 3d of March, 1883, Christal commenced an action on the note, and on the same day O’Donnell filed a verified answer admitting each and every allegation - of the complaint, and consenting to a judgment against himself as prayed for. On the same day judgment was entered,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matthews v. ChaboyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Greenwalt v. MuellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Haskin v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Grunsky v. ParlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API