Legal Opinion

Grunsky v. Parlin

California Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1895No. Sac. No. 8PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of San Joaquin and from an order denying a new trial. Ansel Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Britt, C.

Hull was a dealer in stationery and musical instruments. His voluntary petition in insolvency was filed June 16, 1893, and in due course plaintiff was chosen his assignee. At sundry times within three days next before said June 16th, Hull sold to defendant certain pianos and organs, and notes and other contracts previously taken by him in the course of business with his customers; the amount of the sales to defendant was thirteen hundred and eighty-five dollars, of which six hundred and fifty-six dollars was paid in cash, and by agreement the sum of seven hundred and twenty-nine…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bernheim v. ChristalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schilling v. CurranMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Matthews v. ChaboyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API