Ronnie Freeman v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1DissentQuinn, Justice
I respectfully dissent and conclude that the court’s original opinion drafted by Chief Justice Boyd was and is correct. In sum, the trial court erred in prohibiting appellant from assessing whether the potential jurors could be fair and unbiased (as required by law) irrespective of the age of the victim. Furthermore, the recent opinion by a bare majority of the court in Standefer v. State, 59 S.W.3d 177 (Tex.Crim.App.2001) does not persuade me otherwise. Rather it reinforces my conclusion. Admittedly, that writing purports to establish a bright-line rule to be applied when determining whether…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Standefer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Maddux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Ransom v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1982
- Costley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1994
- Gray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.