Legal Opinion

Morse v. Montana Ore-Purchasing Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana

Decided December 10, 1900No. 531PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On Motion for New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

KNOWLES, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this case has petitioned the court for a new trial. As grounds therefor, many alleged reasons are presented. In the argument made in support of the petition only a few of the reasons or grounds for granting the same were urged. The following were presented in the brief of counsel for plaintiff:

1. That the juror Passavant was disqualified for the reason that his name did not appear as a taxpayer on the assessment roll of Lewis and Clarke county, Mont., for the year 1899; that being the county of his residence. The plaintiff failed to interrogate this *338jur…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. United States v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Ex Parte BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Toledo Newspaper Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1915
  3. State v. GordonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. United States v. MarrinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. In re Independent Pub. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API