United States v. Marrin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
On Motion and Reasons for a New Trial.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
In this case, in due time after verdict, the defendant filed motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial. Neither of the six reasons set forth in arrest of judgment raises any question which the court can consider on this motion. Both questions variously stated, to wit, a failure of proof and a variance between the allegata and probata, are questions properly raised by a motion for a new trial. After verdict, a judgment will only be arrested for matter appearing on any part of the record which would render the judgment erroneous, if given. The rule in civil cases…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- People v. StokesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Meyer v. CadwaladerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1891
- Cartwright v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1893
- United States v. OgdenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- United States v. Joel Donald DreerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Kellerman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.