Legal Opinion

Cope v. McClain

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 5, 1975No. 35945PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for damages by Terzah Cope and William H. Cope, her husband, for *7injuries and damages sustained as the result of an alleged battery on Terzah Cope by Jack McClain, her brother. There was a jury verdict for the defendant from which Terzah Cope and William H. Cope appeal. We regret, that we must once again, dismiss an appeal.

Plaintiff’s first point reads:

“The trial court erred in giving instruction No. 4, the defendant-respondent’s self defense instruction for the reason that there was no substantial evidence to support such a self defense instruction.”

Rule 84.04(d) requires…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. M. F. A. Co-Operative Ass'n of St. ElizabethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. Sullivan v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Nutz v. ShepherdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Donnell v. Vigus Quarries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Island View Sales Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Martin v. Circuit Court of the City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Rushing v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Midwest Lumber Co. v. SellersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API