Legal Opinion

People v. Rush

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1993No. B067774PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

Michael Peter Rush appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his conviction of second degree robbery *23and grand theft of an automobile (Pen. Code, § 211 and former § 487h, subd. (a), now § 487, subd. 3), each with the use of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 12022.5), as alleged in a two-count information. He was sentenced to concurrent seven-year prison terms, comprised of a three-year term on each count enhanced by four-year terms for firearm use, and contends he “was improperly convicted of robbery and the lesser included offense of grand theft…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. MinceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re MaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. People v. MedinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API