Legal Opinion
Wayne v. Chopivsky
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 9, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-5943PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
Presently pending are plaintiffs’ and defendants’ cross motions for summary judgment in this diversity action arising from a contract dispute. 1 For the reasons stated below, I grant plaintiffs’ motion and deny defendants’ motion.
I. FACTS
The facts leading up to this litigation are essentially undisputed. Plaintiffs are employees of the Fairmount Institute (TFI), a psychiatric hospital located in Philadelphia. Defendants were controlling shareholders of National Psychiatric Institutes, Inc. (NPI), which owned TFI. In August, 1982, all the stock of NPI…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Steuart v. McChesneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Pines Plaza Bowling, Inc. v. Rossview, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Chervenak, Keane & Co. v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gebhardt & Smith LLP v. Maryland Port AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Partha Sarathi Katari v. Wabtec, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Wayne (Eugene C.) v. Chopivsky (George, Jr.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987