Legal Opinion

Gahagan Canavan Corp. v. Longacre Engineering & Construction Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1933Published

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

Civil Practice Act, section 278, subdivisions 1 (c) and 2 (b) and Rules of Civil Practice, rule 106, subdivision 4, and rule 109, subdivision 3, apply, by their very terms, only to a situation where the pendency of another action between the same parties for the same cause appears on the face of the complaint or answer. This is also the holding in Gentilala v. Fay Taxicabs, Inc. (214 App. Div. 255; revd. on other grounds, 243 N. Y. 397), and in Thurman v. Gordon Co., Inc. (215 App. Div. 187). Where the pendency of another action between the same parties for the same cause does not appear on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gentilala v. Fay Taxicabs, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Gentilala v. Fay Taxicabs, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Thurman v. B. & E. Gordon Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API