Macomb County v. AFSCME Council 25
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Dissent
MARKEY, EJ.
(dissenting). I respectfully dissent. I conclude that respondents did not commit an unfair labor practice (ULP) when the Macomb County Retirement Commission adopted new mortality tables to ensure that optional retirement benefits that include payment to a surviving beneficiary are the actuarial equivalent of the negotiated defined-benefit straight-life pension. I would hold that the retirement commission is vested with the authority to determine mortality tables and actuarial assumptions necessary to ensure “actuarial equivalence” of optional retirement benefits, and that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Port Huron Education Ass'n v. Port Huron Area School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.