Legal Opinion

Blu v. Clallam County

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 24, 2024No. 3:23-cv-06022Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 C BLU, CASE NO. 3:23-cv-06022-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 12 v. FOR LACK OF SERVICE (DKT. NO. 11) 13 CLALLAM COUNTY et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint for lack 17 of service. (Dkt. No. 11.) On November 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in 18 forma pauperis (“IFP”) and a proposed complaint. (Dkt. No. 1.) On December 21, 2023, the 19 Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP (Dkt. No.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Efaw v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. 2,164 Watches, More or Less, Bearing A Registered Trademark of Guess?, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. A.T. v. Everett Sch. Dist.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API