Legal Opinion

Wright v. Couch

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 14, 1932No. 897PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunderburk, J.

D. R. Couch and G. C. Forgus sued Rufus Wright and recovered judgment against him upon a promissory note, with foreclosure of a chattel mortgage lien upon certain live stock. The trial court sustained a general demurrer of the plaintiffs to a cross-action of the defendant, and the correctness of that action of the court is the only matter presented upon this appeal for our review and determination.

The allegations in the cross-action were briefly to the effect that, in the deal by which the defendant leased from plaintiffs 4½ sections of land (owned by Couch) adjoining lands owned by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Dallas Farm MacHinery Company v. ReavesTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Distributors Investment Co. v. PattonTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. ElkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Ross & Sensibaugh v. McLellandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API