Legal Opinion

Millett v. Omaha Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1929No. 8118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

Prom a judgment allowing a set-off in the sum of $7,601.-38, the appellant, as plaintiff in the trial court, has prosecuted its appeal. There is no controversy on the facts.

The Drovers’ National Bank of Denver was doing business as a National Bank at Denver, Colo., until the appointment of appellant receiver on December 17, 1925. Prior to that date, it had business transactions with the appellee bank of Omaha, Neb. When the receiver was appointed, the appellee bank was admittedly indebted to Drovers’ National Bank in the sum of $8,274.17, on deposit previously made.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cary v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Johnson—Brinkman Commission Co. v. Central BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Gaines v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. McKee v. LamonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. National Bank of Commerce v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Wolf Mfg. IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1935
  3. Gray v. CorneliusDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Tudor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API