Conant v. Deep Creek & Curlew Valley Irrigation Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, First District. — Hon. O. H. Hart, Judge. Suit by Henry Conant against tbe Deep Creek & Curlew Valley Irrigation Company and others. From a decree in favor of complainants, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
' MORSE, District Judge.
It appears from tbe record in this case that in April, 1896, tbe respondent Henry Conant and one Edward Conant commenced an action- in tbe district . court of Oneida county, in tbe State of Idaho, to quiet their title to certain waters flowing through the channel of a stream or creek commonly called “Deep Creek” or “Curlew Creek,” which rises in Oneida county, Idaho, and flows through a portion of that county into Box Elder county, Utah, in which action all the appellants appeared, either as defendants or as complainants in intervention, and each claimed to be the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carpenter v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Simmons v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Tucker v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1888
- Sweetland v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wyoming v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Willey v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
- Lakeside Irrigation Co. v. Markham Irrigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
- Taylor v. HulettIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.