Legal Opinion

Ogden v. Hamer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1944PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The proceeding instituted by the landlords, if successful, would result in a forfeiture of the demised twenty-one year term, and would also operate as a forfeiture of tenant’s building to the landlords.

The evidence adduced at the trial established that there was substantial compliance by the tenant in performing the work necessary for the removal of all violations filed against the tenant’s property. Under the provisions of the lease, the tenant had the right to remedy the alleged default by removing violations within the time fixed for the termination of the lease. Where, as here, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norman S. Riesenfeld, Inc. v. R-W Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vanguard Diversified, Inc. v. Review Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Caspert v. Anderson Apartments, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949
  3. 6th Avenue & 24th Street Corp. v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Madison Stores, Inc. v. Enkay Sales Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1955
  5. Fly Hi Music Corp. v. 645 Restaurant Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API