Appel v. Wolf
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 HOWARD APPEL, Case No.: 3:18-cv-814-L-BGS 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 10 v. SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE [Doc. 5] 11 ROBERT S. WOLF, 12 Defendant. 13 14 Pending before the Court is the Special Motion to Strike filed under California’s 15 Anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute by Defendant Robert 16 S. Wolf (“Defendant”). See Doc. 5. The motion is fully briefed. The Court finds this 17 motion suitable for disposition on the papers without oral argument under Civil Local Rule 18…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.