Legal Opinion

Clark v. Joiner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 2000No. A99A1765PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Presiding Judge.

We granted Thomas and Beverly Clark’s application for interlocutory review after the trial court denied their motion for summary judgment on John Joiner’s claim for damages from a dog bite. Because there is no evidence that the dog had ever bitten anyone before or that the Clarks knew that the dog had any propensity to bite someone, we reverse.

This case arose when Joiner went to the Clarks’ house to sell them insurance. Joiner had gotten out of his car and was walking to the house when the Clarks’ two dogs ran toward him. Joiner said the dogs did not act hostile but…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Rice v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Hamilton v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Rowlette v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Durham v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. AC&S, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Johnston v. WarendhCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Harper v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Phiel v. BostonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Clark v. JoinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API