Legal Opinion

In re V.K.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 2000No. Nos. 96-FS-1354, 96-FS-1355, 96-FS-1362, 96-FS-1363, 96-FS-1377 and 96-FS-1378PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

This case arises from the trial court’s denial of appellant M.K.’s motion to reconsider a stipulation that her grandchildren were neglected because their mother had died. On appeal, M.K. argues that the stipulation was legally defective because it alleged neglect solely due to the death of the mother, and because it was not signed by her, the only party named in the original neglect petition. Therefore, she asserts, the trial court erred in allowing the stipulation to stand because it prevented her from contesting the neglect allegations in the original neglect petition…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. William Brown, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  3. Fuller v. FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. In re E.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. In Re J.J.Z.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CX Reinsurance Co. v. Leader Realty Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API