Harris v. Shotwell
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs, A. B. Shotweil and his wife, filed suit for a change of custody of their grandson against the child’s mother, Bobbie Jean Shotweil Harris. The attorneys for the defendant mother, preparing a defense in her behalf, incurred $268.50 in expenses to her account in connection with depositions. Such expenses were properly charged as costs.
Plaintiffs moved for a non-suit. Without necessity of citation of law we have taken note that for plaintiffs to obtain a non-suit of their affirmative action is an absolute right, and, where as in the instant case there is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Siepert v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Lumpkin v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
3Cited by18 opinions
- Su Inn Ho v. University of Texas at Arlington, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
- Southerland v. Northeast Datsun, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983
- Whitley v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BeuhlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Ferguson v. BealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.