Legal Opinion

Heman v. Jefferson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 3, 1985No. 4-84-0862PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trapp

This is the second time this cause appears in the appellate court. Plaintiff seeks cancellation of an oil and gas lease. We reverse and remand, finding that plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment. A default judgment entered against one set of defendants may not be used as an admission of a disputed evidentiary matter by the nondefaulting defendants. Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion in effect used the defaulted defendants’ admission of a failure to reasonably produce the disputed property as the basis of cancelling the non-defaulting defendants’ interests in the property.

A detailed…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fooden v. Board of GovernorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Caley v. ManickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Caley v. ManickeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  4. The People v. ChambersIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Stahelin v. Bd. Ed. SD No. 4 DuPage CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kochan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Garde v. Country Life Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Loos v. American Energy Savers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Mazzone v. HolmesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Komater v. Kenton Court AssociatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API