Burleson v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order sustaining a demurrer. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
— On the third day of March, 1885, the respondent, an insurance company, entered into a contract with one Abbott, by which it appointed said Abbott its agent in the state of California, and agreed to pay him certain commissions on premiums collected on insurance business done by him, and seven and one half per cent commissions on renewal premiums obtained, under a certain contract of the respondent and certain other agents, and under the contract with Abbott. This commission on renewal premiums was to be paid “while he retained the agency, and no longer.” In consideration of the payment of…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Body-Steffner Co. v. Flotill Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. Murphy (In Re Murphy)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1981
- Goodspeed v. Great Western Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Lynch v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Scott v. Travellers' InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.