Stroble v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R'y Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Winneshiek District Court. ActioN to recover damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in the employment of defendant, on the ground that the injuries were caused by the negligence of defendant. There was a judgment upon a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBegK, J.
I. There was evidence tending to establish the following facts: Plaintiff, witb another, was employed to i master personaHii-: live appfh°" ot servantes contributory negligence. elevate coal to a platform or other place conve-nient for delivering it to the tenders of engines, It was often necessary for plaintiff and his co-employe working with him to pass to and from the platform to the floor upon which the coal was x . . first deposited. Stairs or steps constructed of planks were provided for the use of these men and others who had occasion to ascend to or descend from the platform. While…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mad River & Lake Erie Railroad v. BarberOhio Supreme Court · 1856
- Ballou v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Foley v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. BragonierIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Malone v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dillon v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArterySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Sams v. St. Louis & Meramec River RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Akeson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Butler v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.