Legal Opinion

Day v. Ward

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1929No. 19851PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESTER, V. C. J.

This is an original action in this court brought by the plaintiffs, in which they seek a writ of prohibition for the purpose of preventing thhe defendants from further prosecuting proceedings in the case of Exchange Trust Co. et al. v. J. F. Godfrey et al., said cause being heretofore decided by this court and being reported in 128 Okla. 108, 261 Pac. 197.

By the former opinion of this court, the cause was reversed, with direction to the district court to enter judgment for the plaintiffs in error. The district court, upon receiving the mandate from this court, entered its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. State Ex Rel. Haskell v. HustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Ex Parte the Union Steamboat CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brady v. FrengerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Townley v. A. C. Miller Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Crews v. BirdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Chandler v. McKeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Saccomano v. North Idaho Shingle Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API