Baggett v. Dunn
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Application for - a writ of mandate compelling the respondent as controller of state to draw his warrant on the state treasury in favor of petitioner, Baggett, payable out of the general fund, for the sum of two hundred dollars ($200), as salary of petitioner as Deputy Supreme Court Reporter for the month of July, 1885.
The act authorizing the appointment of Deputy Supreme Court Reporter was passed February 26, 1881 (Stats. 1881, p. 9), and is entitled “An act to provide for the appointment of a Deputy Supreme Court Reporter, and to regulate his compensation.” The act is in these words: —
*76“Sec.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mandel v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- California Teachers Assn. v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Raymond v. ChristianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- State ex rel. Birdzell v. JorgensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Proll v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.