Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. FHP International Corp.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided November 19, 1996No. CIV-96-1362-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SILVER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Diane and Joel Schwartz have filed a Motion to Remand this action to state court. Defendants FHP International, FHP, Inc., FHP of Arizona, and Ultralink, Inc. (“FHP”) have filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ state law causes of action.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Diane Schwartz was eligible to receive, selected and received FHP’s HMO benefit coverage under the Group Service Agreement issued by FHP, Inc. to Xerox corporation, as a dependent of her husband, Xerox employee Joel Schwartz.

Plaintiff Diane Schwartz began to receive medical care from FHP…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Plaid Pantries, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2001
  2. Newman v. Spectrum Stores, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  3. Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. In Re Pharmaceutical Ind. Aver. Whole. Price Lit.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  5. Negron v. PatelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API