Legal Opinion

Dale's Shoe Store, Inc. v. Dale

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1961No. 38994PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

The only question in this case is whether the contract contended for by Mrs. Dale is definite enough to be enforceable. She contended by her evidence that authorized officers of the defendant corporation agreed to pay her for services rendered the corporation “when the store got on its feet and got to making a profit.” The quoted provision is a condition precedent and is an integral part of the contract. If it is not definite and understandable the whole contract must fall. There is no evidence of any kind in the case which throws any light on the meaning of the condition…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. E. D. Lacey Mills, Inc. v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Farmer v. ArgentaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Demer v. Capital City Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Callaway v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Transkey, Inc. v. AdkinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API