Legal Opinion

Follain v. Dupre

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 15, 1845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of St. Landry, King, J.

1Opinion of the CourtGarland, J.

Two suits, which, by consent of the parties, were cumulated and tried together below, were instituted on eleven promissory notes, by the holders, against the drawers, and first endorser, Jacques Dupré. The first suit is on five notes, all dated the 24th April, 1842: one payable at four months, for #2,400; one at six months, for #4,000; one at eight months, for #4,000.; one at nine months, for #4,000; and one at twelve months, for #5,000; making the sum of #19,400, with interest at ten per cent per annum on that sum, from the date of the notes until paid, and #21 50 the costs of protest. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bank of Columbia Ex Rel. Bank of United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. President of the Bank of the United States v. CarnealSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Franklin v. VerboisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
  4. Bank of Louisiana v. WatsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  5. Oakey v. Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Slidell v. RightorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  2. Conery v. HayesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1867
  3. Jex v. TureaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1867
  4. New Orleans Canal & Banking Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API