Legal Opinion
Andress v. Daubert Law Firm, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 24, 2016No. 16-1078PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Paul Andress brought this suit against lawyer Michael Stueland and Daubert Law Firm claiming that the defendants violated several provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, see 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692a-1692l, during state-court litigation to collect a defaulted car loan. The district court dismissed some of the claims under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, see D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923), and the rest for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Kelley v. Med-1 Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Quick v. Educap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Whitehead v. Discover BankDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016
- Black v. GoodwinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Quick v. Educap Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018