Legal Opinion

United States v. Batiste

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 8, 1981No. ACM S24979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MAHONEY, Judge:

Theft of urine. The accused claims his acts did not constitute the offense because urine has no value and therefore cannot be the subject of larceny. Resisting the temptation to draw upon the colorful and imaginative arguments of counsel, we disagree.

As a part of the Air Force drug testing and rehabilitation program, samples of urine were collected, labeled, and prepared for shipment to a testing laboratory. The accused, a shipping clerk, was supposed to send the samples to the testing laboratory. Before doing so on the two occasions in question, he removed the specimen…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. HayesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. EppersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  3. United States v. WoodsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. McCollumUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. AntonelliU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. NeffU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API