D.A. Hill Co. v. Clevetrust Realty Investors
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentWieand, Judge
A careful review of the evidence in this case persuades me that D.A. Hill Company (Hill) and Felheim Roofing Company (Felheim) failed to prove causes of action for unjust enrichment against CleveTrust Realty Investors, Inc. (CleveTrust). Therefore, I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s affirmance of the judgments entered by the trial court.1
CleveTrust agreed to provide construction financing for the Edinboro Mall in Erie County pursuant to a construction loan agreement with Edinboro Development Company (Ed-inboro), the owner of the land. Pursuant to the terms of that agreement,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- West v. Peoples First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Dudash v. DudashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Myers-Macomber Engineers v. M. L. W. Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.