Floyd v. Gray
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Chief Justice.
The major issue we decide on this appeal is whether the statutory tort of loss of consortium is within the purview of the Motor Vehicle Reparations Act thus making the two year statute of limitations therein applicable. The Court of Appeals answered the question in the affirmative. We disagree, and reverse that part of the opinion. In all other respects, we affirm.
This appeal arises from a judgment of the Union Circuit Court in which a jury returned a verdict for the respondent Thomas Gray, against the movants Lewis Floyd and Hartford Bakery, Inc., in the amount of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fann v. McGuffeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
- Gray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
- Tucker v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
- Armes v. ArmesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
3Cited by26 opinions
- Bailey v. ReevesKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Conway v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Crime Fighters Patrol v. HilesKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Bradford v. Bracken CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
- Department of Education v. BlevinsKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.