Legal Opinion

United States v. Sweeney

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas

Decided July 22, 1899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

, BOGEBS, District Judge.

The above cases were consolidated for the purposes of trial, and one opinion will he delivered. The importance of these cases makes it necessary that a brief résumé of the facts and circumstances, as shown by the record, leading up to these prosecutions, be stated:

On the 22d day of April, 1899, the Kansas & Texas Coal Company filed its bill in equity in this court against William Denney and others (whose names will hereafter appear), and prayed for an injunction. A temporary restraining order was issued, and service liad upon the defendants. Kone of the defendants…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  5. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Union Pac. R. Co. v. RuefU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1902
  2. State v. WismanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Ripon Knitting Works v. SchreiberDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1900
  4. Swepston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  5. State v. HurstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API