Legal Opinion
Witso v. Overby
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 2001No. C6-99-1618Published
1Opinion of the Court
627 N.W.2d 63 (2001)
In re the Matter of Benjamin G. WITSO, Respondent,
v.
Mary C. OVERBY, et al., Petitioners, Appellants.
No. C6-99-1618.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 7, 2001.
John Robinson Hill, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., Bloomington, for appellants.
Susan Anne Daudelin, Walling & Berg, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.
Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
Respondent Benjamin Witso (Witso) seeks custody and visitation rights with his putative child M.R.O. and petitioned under the Minnesota Parentage Act (MPA)[1] for a court order to compel…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Marriage of RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- R.Mcg. v. J.W.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Lenz v. Coon Creek Watershed DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- B.H. v. K.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.