Legal Opinion

United States v. Shoji

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 13, 1976No. 75-31 C.A.D. 1169PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 74 Cust. Ct. 121, C.D. 4595, 396 F. Supp. 748 (1975), granting appellee-importer’s motion for summary judgment and denying the Government’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The Customs Court sustained appellee’s claim that the imported synthetic rubber footwear, imported in 1962 and 1963 and classified as “Articles * * * composed wholly or in part of carbon,” are properly classified as “synthetic rubber articles.” We affirm.

The Imported Articles

Appellee’s “statement of material facts as to which [it] * * *…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosenberger v. GuthmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Rettinger Raincoat Mfg. Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Sumitomo Shoji New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  2. Walter Dawgie Ski Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Texas Instruments Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  5. United States v. Algon Chemical Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API