Taylor v. Universal Tire, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TODD, Presiding Judge Middle Section.
The defendants, Universal Tire, Inc., and B.F. Goodrich Company, have appealed from a non jury judgment against them and in favor of the plaintiff, Charles Taylor, in the amount of $66,223.56 for rent due under “percentage of sales” provision of a lease contract.
Issues presented by appellants are as follows:
I.Whether the Trial Court erred in holding that Universal Tire, Inc. must continue to include in the computation of overage rental the revenue from sales and service of large truck tires though that business is conducted at a location separate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stop & Shop, Inc. v. GanemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Oman Construction Co. v. Tennessee Central, Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Fox v. Fox Valley Trotting ClubIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- William Berland Realty Co. v. Hahne & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Kroger Co. v. Bonny Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Chester-O'Donley & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Simonton v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- APAC-Tennessee, Inc. v. J.M. Humphries Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Shelby v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1993
- Lewis v. MuchmoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.