Legal Opinion

Ikedilo v. Statter

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 1, 2023No. 1:19-cv-09967Unknown

1Opinion

[ees] DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT a a FILED □ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | DOC #: _.. □ Ee OJINIKA TIKEDILO, Plaintiff, 19-CV-09967 (RA)(SN) -against- ORDER MINDY STATTER, et al., Defendants. panne eX SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs letter and newly-filed response to Defendants’ Rule 56.1 Statement (the “Response”). See ECF No. 96. Plaintiffs counsel represents that his failure to file the Response was an oversight—despite having been on notice since the filing of Defendants’ reply brief on May 17, 2023, which noted counsel’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. T.Y. Ex Rel. T.Y. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. Reeves v. City of YonkersDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API