Legal Opinion

Leyda v. Roach

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided January 8, 1987No. Civ. 86-171-D-2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

VIETOR, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action under the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (PKPA), 28 U.S.C. § 1738A. He asserts that jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331, which provides that the federal district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.

Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that he and defendant were married to one another in Iowa in 1977, and in 1978 a child, Kimberly, was bom to them. In 1981 defendant commenced a dissolution of marriage action…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Lee v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Gary McDougald Cross-Appellant v. Vivian L. Jenson, Cross-Appellee, Clarence Ehli, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Evans v. EvansDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API