Jones v. Rees-Max, LLC
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs move for partial summary judgment as to their claims that Defendants violated Minn.Stat. §§ 325N.04, 325N.11, 325N.12 and 325N.17. Defendants REES-MAX, LLC, Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC (“REES”) and Chadwick Banken (“Bank-en”) move for summary judgment as to all counts. Defendant Central Bank has joined REES-MAX, REES and Banken’s motion for summary judgment.
II. BACKGROUND
A. The parties
Plaintiffs, Michael E. Jones (“M. Jones”) and Edith A. Jones…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Lelar M. Lagrone v. Alan H. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- LeSage v. Norwest Bank Calhoun-Isles, N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Finnegan v. SunTrust MortgageDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015