Legal Opinion

Nash v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 2, 1987No. 05-86-00794-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWELL, Justice.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Our previous opinion is withdrawn. The following is now the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff, Billy Doyle Nash, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, Carolina Casualty Insurance Company (“Carrier”). Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting Carrier’s motion for summary judgment, and in denying his cross-motion. We hold that plaintiff’s tort, contract, DTPA 1 , and Insurance Code 2 claims are barred by limitations and that the claim for attorney’s fees is barred by res judicata. Accordingly, we affirm.

This action…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Borderlon v. PeckTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Argonaut Southwest Insurance Company v. MaupinTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Ogletree v. CratesTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hernandez v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In the Matter of Placid Oil Company, Debtor. Professional Geophysics, Inc. v. Placid Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Whatley v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  4. Harrison v. Bass Enterprises Production Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  5. Long v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API