Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Anderson County

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 16, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2011-194209; No. 5072PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeathers, J.

In this breach of contract case, Appellant Michael Cunningham seeks review of the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment to Respondent Anderson County (the County) on all of Cunningham’s causes of action. Cunningham challenges the circuit court’s conclusion that his employment contract with the County was void. Cunningham also challenges the circuit court’s conclusions that (1) he could not avail himself of the public policy exception to the at-will employment doctrine, and (2) his accrued sick leave did not constitute “wages” under the South Carolina Payment of Wages Act.1 We affirm…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Hancock v. Mid-South Management Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Doe v. MarionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Dawkins v. FieldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. West Anderson Water District v. City of AndersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  2. Cunningham v. Anderson CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  3. Cunningham v. Anderson CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  4. Cunningham v. Anderson CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API