Legal Opinion
Cato v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1979No. 1179S310PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
HUNTER, Justice.
This case comes to us on a petition to transfer filed by the state based upon a claim of error in the decision of the Court of Appeals, First District, in regard to the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain Cato’s conviction. Steven Cato and Onice Fields were both convicted by a jury of second-degree burglary. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Fields but reversed Cato’s conviction because of the insufficiency of the evidence. Cato v. State, (1979) Ind.App., 389 N.E.2d 332. Their decision was based upon their determination that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bruce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Pirtle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Funk v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Randall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Stabenow v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.