James Evans v. Mark Martin
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Petitioner-Appellant James Evans (“Evans”), an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont, Texas, filed a pro se petition alleging his due process rights were violated when he was disciplined for possessing a cell phone. Evans claims that the regulation he was charged with violating, 28 C.F.R. § 541.18, which prohibits the “possession, manufacture, or introduction of a hazardous tool,” ran afoul of the Administrative Procedure Act’s notice-and-comment procedures and failed to provide notice of the conduct proscribed. The district court denied Evans’s petition.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown Express, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- French v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Shell Offshore Inc. v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anthony Accurso v. C. RiversDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
- Perez v. HijarDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2022
- Rindahl v. ReischDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025